Frequently Asked Questions

Select a FOA to view questions and answers for the specific funding opportunity. Alternatively select "Non-FOA related items" to view system FAQ items.

Question 1: I work with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium in Alaska where I support rural medical clinics for Native Alaskan communities. Some of the clinics I support have been looking for funding to reduce the energy consumption of their facilities. From the information online, it sounds like the grant for Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands would be a good fit. Would you mind confirming whether this is the case and if it would be worthwhile to apply for these funds? Also, is there a particular emphasis on particular types of energy projects? (i.e. renewable energy, reducing energy consumption, studies/audits, etc.).
Answer 1:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

Please review the requirements of the FOA to determine whether this FOA would be a good fit for reducing energy consumption in rural medical clinics for Native Alaskan communities. Specifically, see Section I, Funding Opportunity Description, and Section III, Eligibility Information.

The focus of this FOA is the deployment of commercially-proven warrantied (1) clean energy and energy efficiency retrofits on tribal buildings (Topic Area 1); or (2) community-scale clean energy deployment (Topic Area 2). [Emphasis added]

Question 2: Good afternoon. The Washoe Housing Authority a (TDHE) is interested in this opportunity, is there more information regarding this funding.
Answer 2:

More information can be found on EERE Exchange at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/Default.aspx#FoaId4a7967f3-f608-497f-a02d-95c215342d15. The Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) itself can be found under “FOA Documents” and required application documents found by clicking “View Required Application Documents”.

Please specifically review Section III, Eligibility Information.

 
Question 3: I was wondering if installing solar panels to power a water pump for a community well could be considered an eligible project under Topic Area 1?
Answer 3:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

“Tribally-owned or controlled building(s)” for purposes of this FOA, is one where the eligible entity has the authority to retrofit the building and where the building is either owned by the eligible entity or tribal members, or the eligible entity has a long-term lease (at least 20 years). Buildings may include, but are not limited to, tribal member homes, schools, community buildings, clinics, tribal government buildings, utility facilities (such as water/waste water systems), tribal casinos, or tribal businesses.”

Please also note that under Topic Area 1.a, the amount of energy displaced (minimum of 15%) must be demonstrated based on actual energy use, along with the availability of the renewable energy resource.

 
Question 4: We are looking at developing a community-scale PV solar installation of about 50 kW with a Tribe in south-central Montana. Before we go too far along the process I thought I'd quickly outline the scope and see if this is a program that might be funded. And if not, what we can do to make it more appropriate: Working with energy efficiency auditors in Montana we're going to locate a cluster of tribally-owned homes that would benefit from a centralized ground-mount PV system and a 100% weatherization and efficiency upgrade (without DOE $). A local bank would put up the other 50% of the total project cost (of installation of PV), own the array and take advantage of the ITC 30%. A small part of the end-users' savings on their electricity bill would go back to the bank until the bank's overall investment is made whole, at which point ownership of that asset will be transferred to tribal housing authority. Clearly many more details to follow but are we on the "right track"?
Answer 4:
Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

 

Under Topic Area 2, the minimum rated capacity is 50kW, must be on Indian land, and must benefit the eligible entity (Indian Tribe, Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization, or Tribal Consortium) and tribal community; however, the buildings where the energy or heat is to be used do not necessarily need to be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity.

Be aware that “[u]nless a statute specifically authorizes the Federal agency to vest title in the Recipient without further obligation to the Federal Government, and the Federal agency elects to do so, the title must be a conditional title. These conditions include, but are not limited to, restrictions against encumbrance without prior approval of DOE and DOE retains a property interest in the equipment until such time as the equipment has a fair market value of $5,000 or less.” See Section IV.H.6., Equipment and Supplies). 

Question 5: Can you tell me how many applications were received for FY2014 Clean Energy projects on tribal lands? I see that 11 were awarded. Thank you
Answer 5:

Except through a Freedom of information Act (FOIA) request, DOE does not make the number of applications received under a particular Funding Opportunity Announcement public.

 
Question 6: I just got my patent granted for a mechanism to generate electricity from ocean waves very cost effectively. I am seeking some fund or assistance in making full scale model of my mechanism. Presently I have two small working proto-types, and 3d models. I came across this funding; a) Can you please tell me does it apply to individuals like myself? b) Can you please explain me the procedure in brief? Also what the process is. The reason I am asking is because I am just an engineer. I don’t have ability to write long long reports. I do have numbers on paper but nothing like a business school paper. Although I have some of my own money to put into this project. I will really appreciate any guidance you would provide me.
Answer 6:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

Subject to the definitions and requirements in Section III.A of the FOA, eligible under this FOA is restricted to: (1) an Indian Tribe; or (2) Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization; and on whose (3) Indian Lands the project(s) will be located. For additional information, see Section III of the FOA (Eligibility Information).

Please be aware that to be eligible under this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), the clean energy and energy efficiency measures must be commercially-proven warrantied.  Specifically, Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 9, where TRL 9 is “Commercial-Scale Production/Application” and represents an in-service application of the technology in its final form and under mission condition and at TRL 9, the actual, commercial-scale system is proven through successful mission operations, whereby it is fielded and being used in commercial application. Information relative to the technology and its TRL should be provided as part of the application. For more on TRL, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_readiness_level.

A full application requires the components identified in the table on pages 24 and 25 of the FOA document, including a technical volume that must include the elements described in the table beginning on page 27 of the FOA document.

 
Question 7: I saw the FOA for deployment of clean energy on Indian lands (DE-FOA-0001390). As part of our DEMD-funded project, we have had a qualified electrical engineer and residential solar expert evaluate 12 homes on the Reservation that are totally off-grid and have no power except what they can generate via propane or diesel generators. He is in the process of finalizing cost estimates for the installation of tracking solar systems and storage that would provide sufficient power for home use, with occasional propane or diesel back-up as needed. When his cost estimates are finalized, our challenge is to find funding for the actual installation of these systems. Is this deployment grant a potential source for funding of actual equipment purchase and installation? We are told that preliminary estimates put the cost of solar installations for these 12 off-grid homes at between $300K and $500K, but we are still waiting for the more detailed figures from our consultant. Would appreciate your guidance as to whether we should seek funding under this program, or if there is a program more specifically tailored to our purposes.
Answer 7:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.” Therefore, we are unable to advise you or provide guidance.

 

The focus of this FOA is the installation of commercially-proven warrantied:

Topic Area 1: Clean energy and energy efficiency retrofits on tribal buildings;

a. Clean Energy Systems (Topic Area 1.a.)

b. “Deep Energy Retrofit” Energy Efficiency Measures (Topic Area 1.b.)

And,

Topic Area 2:  Clean energy systems on a community-scale.

[Emphasis added]

 

Because 12 homes likely do not constitute “many buildings or an entire community and serving a substantial number of the total buildings within a community and/or providing a substantial percentage of the total community energy load”, your planned project may not meet the “community scale” requirements for Topic Area 2. Therefore, Topic Area 1 may be of particular interest. With regard to Topic Area 1, please note that:

 

Under Topic Area 1.a, Tribal Building Clean Energy, the clean energy systems (renewable energy systems or combined heat and power systems) must:

 

Displace an existing energy source (e.g., electricity, heating oil, diesel oil, natural gas or any other energy source or fuel used for electrical production, heating and/or cooling) by at least 15% on a source energy basis, and energy generated by combined heat and power systems must displace 15% of the combined electricity and heating fuels on a source energy basis (see Appendix C). Be a minimum of 10 kW rated capacity (or Btu equivalent of 34,121 Btu/hr for heating and cooling), and Use commercially-proven warrantied technology.

 

Under Topic Area 1.b, “Deep Energy Retrofit” Energy Efficiency Measures, the deep energy retrofit(s) must: Be based on a prior energy audit or industrial energy assessment (hereafter referred to as “assessment”); and Demonstrate the potential of at least a 20% reduction in the total of all energy and fuel used (total of all energy and fuel sources combined, including but not limited to, electricity, propane, heating oil, diesel oil, natural gas, or any other energy or fuel used) in the building and improve comfort, durability, health, and air quality of a home or building.

 

Be aware that under Topic Area 1, the DOE funding per individual award may vary between $50,000 and $500,000, and not to exceed $500,000 and that 50% cost share is required, unless a cost share reduction request is received and approved.

 

Question 8: I have a question regarding the DOE funding for energy efficiency improvements. The Tribe is in the process of installing a natural gas distribution system in our largest tribal community. This will replace our existing propane (LP) tanks. Would any of the costs associated with installing the natural gas distribution system or retrofitting our existing facilities to convert from LP gas to natural gas be eligible for this grant program?
Answer 8:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

 

“Clean energy systems” for purposes of this FOA include renewable energy power systems and combined heat and power systems, where “combined heat and power systems”, for purposes of this announcement, include, but are not limited to, integrated systems that simultaneously generate heat and power using energy efficient turbines, reciprocating engines, micro-turbines, fuel cells, and waste heat recovery systems (capturing heat discarded by an existing process and using that heat directly or to generate power). Eligible combined heat and power systems may only be fueled by either: (1) renewable energy resources, or (2) natural gas. Combined heat and power systems not fueled by either renewable energy resources or natural gas will not be considered.

 

In addition to the other requirements identified in the FOA, a combined heat and power system would need to (1) displace an existing energy source (e.g., electricity, heating oil, diesel oil, natural gas or any other energy source or fuel used for electrical production, heating and/or cooling) by at least 15% on a source energy basis, and energy generated by combined heat and power systems must displace 15% of the combined electricity and heating fuels on a source energy basis (Topic Area 1.a) or (2) for community-scale power generation be a minimum of 50 kW rated capacity (Topic Area 2).

 

Be aware that a 50% cost share is required, unless a cost share rduction request is sumitted and approved by DOE. See the estimated funding and maximum DOE funding amounts by Topic Area under Section II.A.1.

 

 

 
Question 9: Our Native Alaskan Village is considering applying for US DOE Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands funding for 2015 (CFDA 81.087), for a run-of-river hydropower project in Alaska. The Village understands that run-of-river hydropower is an eligible technology. One of the most costly components of the run of river hydropower clean energy system is the penstock, or “pipeline” that is used to convey water from a diversion constructed along the river, 3 miles downstream to the project’s powerhouse, where it will be directed through nozzles to rotate the project’s turbine. A penstock is a conventional and essential project feature of all hydropower projects (including run of river projects). Due to the language in the FOA that discusses ineligibility of certain project features, we were hoping if you could please clarify the following question: Is a run of river hydropower clean energy system’s penstock an eligible feature for use of US DOE grant funds under CFDA 81.087?
Answer 9:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

 

Be aware, however, that any project proposed under this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) must (1) Install clean energy and energy efficiency retrofits projects for tribal buildings (Topic Area 1) or (2) deploy clean energy systems on a community-scale (Topic Area 2) and meet the other requirements of the Topic Areas under which the project is proposed. As a penstock in and of itself does not generate electricity or heat, it would not in and of itself be eligible.  If, however, the penstock was proposed as part of a complete hydroelectric generating facility, the costs associated with the penstock would be eligible for consideration.

 
Question 10: Looking at Topic Area 1 – it would appear that a solar-covered parking structure (covered parking with solar panels on top) for our main Community Center Building (assuming it reduced the building’s electricity usage by 20% or more) –would be an eligible project. Please confirm. It also appears we could request up to $500,000 for such a project, as long as we provide a cash match of $500,000 or more? Is that correct?
Answer 10:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

However, per the definition of renewable energy on page 5 of the FOA, photovoltaic (solar electric) for power and active solar thermal systems for space or water heating are indicated as eligible technologies.  Be aware, however, that per page 11 of the FOA, applications proposing the construction of a building or buildings or structures, such as carports will be deemed non-responsive and will not be reviewed or considered. Only the incremental costs associated with the installation of the clean energy system(s) will be considered allocable to the proposed DOE funding project and not the cost of constructing the building(s), or structures, unless those structures are integral to the clean energy system.

As specified under Section II.A of the FOA, DOE funding per individual award under Topic Area 1 varies between $50,000 and$500,000, and not to exceed $500,000. A cost share of 50% of the total project costs is required, unless an Applicant request for reduced cost share is received and approved by DOE.

For example, if the total allowable cost of a selected project is $1,000,000, DOE may share up to $500,000.  Additionally, if the total allowable cost of a selected project is $1,500,000, the maximum amount DOE would consider sharing would be $500,000. If a reduction is not requested, the minimum amount of cost share is 50%, however, there is no maximum amount of cost share an Applicant can contribute.    

 
Question 11: I represent New Energy Corporation in Kansas City, MO, generation systems. We are seeking to participate in Grant Opportunity DE-FOA-0001391 What do we need to provide to participate?
Answer 11:

The Notice of Intent (NOI) numbered DE-FOA-0001391 has been superseded by the issuance of the actual Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) numbered DE-FOA-0001390.

Unless your corporation can be classified as a Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization as defined in the FOA, the New Energy Corporation would not, in and of itself, be eligible.  If the New Energy Corporation can be classified as an Inter-tribal organization and has been granted the authority to apply on behalf of an Indian tribe(s), then the Corporation might be eligible, provided sufficient evidence of that authority is provided as part of the application.

If neither of these situations applies, then the Corporation would need to develop a business relationship with an eligible Indian tribes or tribes, to form a Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization or Inter-tribal Organization, or as a contractor, consultant, or vendor to an eligible Indian Tribe submitting an application.


Question 12: Would you be able to provide the link for the webinar? Your site says it will be posted in 2 days and I do not want to miss it.
Answer 12:

The DOE Office of Indian Energy is hosting a webinar providing information on the funding opportunity to potential applicants on Sept. 16, 2015, from 1–3 p.m. Mountain Time. In addition to describing the FOA in detail, the presenters will discuss who is eligible to apply, what the application needs to include, cost share and other requirements, how to ask questions, and how applications will be selected for funding. For those unable to attend, the webinar will be recorded and posted for viewing.

There is no charge for the webinar, but advance registration is required. Register now.

You may also be interested in joining our email list to receive updates relative to this FOA, other funding opportunities, or tribal-energy related events.

Question 13: I am wondering if a non-tribal program can apply for the “Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands” funding opportunity on behalf of a tribe or in collaboration with a tribe to be used on tribal buildings or tribally owned entities.
Answer 13:

A non-tribal entity may, in collaboration with an Indian tribe, (1) submit an application as a Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization (as that term is defined in the FOA and statute) or (2) be a participant in the application as an investor, consultant, contractor, vendor, or other participant.

 
Question 14: According to the FOA “Renewable Energy Credits or other green attribute monetization funds…” may not be used as part of the cost share obligation (page 18). Are Cap and Trade Credits considered Renewable Energy Credits? Can we use Cap and Trade Credits for cost share obligations?
Answer 14: For purposes of this Funding Opportunity Announcement, Cap and Trade Credits are considered “green attribute monetization funds” and cannot be used as cost share. 
Question 15: I am the CEO of a rural Alaskan electric cooperative. We operate as a non-profit, tax exempt, member-owned utility in rural Alaska, and our member-ratepayer population is at least 50-80% Alaska Native. In fact, the communities we serve were originally 100% Alaska Native settlements which may have been in existence for up to 10,000 years! My question: is a rural Alaskan electric cooperative eligible to apply for funding for a renewable energy project that will displace over half of the current diesel fuel used to generate electricity within the primarily Alaska Native community? The cooperative owns and operates the small, isolated electric grid. The assets are owned by all the ratepayers, which in this case is a large percentage of Alaska Natives. Since we plan to reduce costs and rates to the entire Native village, I would hope that the cooperative would be eligible in its own right. Is it eligible?
Answer 15:

Please be aware that “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.” Refer to section III.F.

As only (1) an Indian Tribe; or (2) Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization; and on whose (3) Indian Lands the project(s) will be located, are eligible; a rural Alaskan electric cooperative, in and of itself, is not eligible. However, a rural Alaska electric cooperative might qualify as an Inter-Tribal Organization as defined in the FOA. Please refer to Section III.A for the definition and the types of evidence needed for an Inter-Tribal Organization to be able to submit an Application on behalf of an Indian Tribe 
Question 16: Good afternoon. I am on the Webinar right now and following along on the EERE website. The Webinar indicated that the Summary Slide template appears under the required forms. It appears to be missing on the EERE page referenced in the Webinar. Where can we get the summary slide template? Thanks.
Answer 16:  Our apologies for the error.  A Microsoft PowerPoint template will be uploaded within the next few days.  
Question 17: Questions are in reference to FOA pg. 11, bullet point 3-4: 1. Is a project involving the installation of a renewable energy system at a new construction site, where funds and match are only proposed for the renewable energy system (i.e. geothermal under a parking lot), allowable? This is unclear in the FOA. 2. If so, are irreversible actions applicable to only the costs associated with the installation of the energy system, or does this requirement encompass the entire construction project? For example, would beginning the construction of the building for which the energy system will be later installed be considered taking irreversible action? a. The FOA references VI.C.6 for more details, but this section could not be located in the FOA.
Answer 17:  Please be aware that “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.” Refer to section III.F. However,

 

  1. A geothermal ground source heat pump (GSHP) is an eligible energy efficiency measure under Topic Area 1.b (see page 8 of the FOA).  Provided the proposed GSHP project meets all the other requirements specified in the FOA, the incremental cost (or cost share) of the  geothermal GSHP would be allowable, provided those costs were not incurred prior to the application being selected. Per Section III.7, “[o]nly the incremental costs associated with the installation of clean energy systems or energy efficiency measures will be considered allocable to the proposed DOE funded project.”

     

  2. Per page 11 (Section II.C) of the FOA, “Any application where the Applicant has already taken irreversible actions regarding the proposed DOE funded project, where the proposed DOE funded project consists of only the installation of clean energy system(s) and/or the installation and energy efficiency measures, and not the construction of a building or structure such as a carport.”  Therefore, beginning the construction of the building, the cost of which is not allocable to the “proposed DOE funded project”, would not be considered irreversible if begun before being selected for negotiation of an award.  Also per Section VI.H.4. “DOE generally does not fund projects that involve major construction (i.e., construction of new buildings, major renovations, or additions to existing buildings). Note that installation of energy efficiency and/or clean systems is not considered major construction.”   

     

 

Question 18: The Tribe received a small grant of approximately $30,000 from BIA in 2013 to install two small 10 KW turbines at two different sites on the Tribe’s land. The small wind turbines were intended to provide electricity to the Tribal offices. The construction of the foundation for the wind turbines was completed at both sites. However, the wind turbines were not installed. Would DOE accept the $30,000 we have invested as in-kind contribution and apply for the new grant?
Answer 18:  Except for pre-award costs with prior DOE approval, only cost share contributions made during the period of the project, if awarded, can be considered.  Additionally, federal funds, unless otherwise allowed by law, are not allowable cost share. See Section II.B (Cost Sharing) for instances where Federal funds are permissible for use as cost share.  
Question 19: Please, could you clarify if the DUNS #, SAM, and others should be that of the technical partner or the Indian tribal organization?
Answer 19:

Please see Section IV. Application and Submission Information, Dun and Bradstreet Universal Number System Number (DUNS) and System for Award Management (SAM), which states “Each applicant is required to: (i) Be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) at https://www.sam.gov before submitting its application; (ii) provide a valid Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number in its application; and (iii) continue to maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active Federal award or an application or plan under consideration by a Federal awarding agency. DOE may not make a Federal award to an applicant until the applicant has complied with all applicable DUNS and SAM requirements and, if an applicant has not fully complied with the requirements by the time DOE is ready to make a Federal award, the DOE may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a Federal award and use that determination as a basis for making a Federal award to another applicant.

 
Question 20: For the Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands opportunity, we’ve reviewed the definition in the FOA a few times (pasted below). But we’re still not sure if our project concept would be eligible. It would be conducted on a facility off the reservation, but owned by a tribal organization (not the Tribe per se and not an individual Indian). Would it be eligible according to the Indian Land definition?
Answer 20:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

 

However, to be eligible, in addition to the other requirements of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), the facility must be “Tribally-owned or controlled” and on “Indian Land”, where “Tribally-owned or controlled building(s)” is one where the eligible entity has the authority to retrofit the building and where the building is either owned by the eligible entity or tribal members, or the eligible entity has a long-term lease (at least 20 years) and “Indian Land” is as defined in the FOA.

 

In this instance, since the facility is not in Alaska and not on Reservation land (or trust land), the land must be held in either: (1) fee simple (purchased or owned); or (2) under a long-term Federal land lease (at least 20 years). See Section IV.C.12 of the FOA for Statements of Commitments and the information relative to the facility and land type, ownership, and commitment that must be included in an application. Specifically, “[i]f the owner or lease holder is not the eligible entity a commitment in writing from the building and/or land owner or lease holder authorizing the Applicant’s use of those building(s) and/or land for the purposed project”.

 

Question 21: I am currently working on the DOE Deployment of Clean Energy on Tribal Lands for a commercial scale solar array under Topic Area 2. I had a few questions. 1. What is the general technical specificity that DOE is looking for? Do you want general criteria for the equipment being used such as nominal power, specific weather requirements, and type of panels, or are you looking for specific name brands of the equipment? 2. When providing proof of the resource this being sunlight available, is DOE needing an irradiation study done, or would a PVWatts model or SAM model be sufficient?
Answer 21:
  1. Per Section IV.C.10., under the Design and Engineering File, supply copies of any hardware performance specification, warranties, engineering drawings, and any other design and engineering data to supplement the Technical Volume.

     

  2. Per Section IV.C. 6., supply any graphics to supplement the Technical Volume including maps, photographs, or other visuals of the project location or building(s) affected by the proposed project. Include evidence of the availability and sustainability of the renewable energy resource or natural gas supply (if applicable) including resource maps and quantitative resource data. Evidence may be in the form of a previously completed resource or feasibility study.

 
Question 22: The subject hydropower project is a small (5 MW) low-impact hydroelectric generation project proposed on Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) lands at Reynolds Creek, on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. US DOE regulation for DE-FOA-0001390: Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands – 2015 states: Renewable energy systems for electric power generation include, but are not limited to, photovoltaic (solar electric), biomass (including waste to energy), wind power, run-of-the-river hydropower, incremental hydropower, or other renewable energy hybrid systems for electricity power generation. Note that for purposes of this FOA, ground source heat pumps are considered an energy efficiency measure and included under Topic Area 1.b. The subject hydropower project’s estimated energy output is in large part subject to seasonal flows and freshet, which is typically considered “run-of-river.” The project also has a storage element due to the presence of a small dam. Please clarify if this project clarifies as “run-of-river hydropower, incremental hydropower, or other renewable energy hybrid systems for electricity power generation” and would therefore be eligible for Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands funds.
Answer 22:

Per Section III.F (Questions Regarding Eligibility) of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.”

 

The project, as described in your question, however would be considered a renewable energy system for purposes of this Funding Opportunity Announcement.

 
Question 23: Re: Section III B Cost Sharing (page 16) All cost share must come from non‐Federal sources unless otherwise allowed by law. Federal Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act (NAHASDA) grant funds are subject to 24 CFR 1000.122, which provides that “there is no prohibition in NAHASDA against using grant funds as matching funds.” Question: Can NAHASDA funds be used as the required non-federal match for this FOA?
Answer 23:

Per the Code of Federal Regulations §1000.122 “May NAHASDA grant funds be used as matching funds to obtain and leverage funding, including any Federal or state program and still be considered an affordable housing activity?”, NAHASDA funds are considered a non-federal source of funds. 

 

Therefore, NAHASDA funds are allowed by law to be used as non-Federal cost share. Per Section III.B, however, “[i]f the funds being proposed as non-Federal cost share against this announcement are from a Federal source, allowed by law, the Applicant must specifically identify those funds and that authority as part of the application.”

 
Question 24: Please see my question below regarding DE-FOA-0001390: Re: Section III A.3)(d) (page 15) For purpose of the FOA, the definition of “Indian Lands” includes “land held in fee simple (purchased or owned).” Question: Does land held in fee simple by an eligible Tribal Organization (rather than an Indian Tribe as defined in the FOA) satisfy this criteria?
Answer 24:

In addition to the other requirements of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), to be eligible, the project must be on “Indian Land”, which includes land held in fee simple (purchased or owned). See Section IV.C.12 of the FOA for Statements of Commitments and the information relative to the land type, ownership, and commitment that must be included in an application. Specifically, “[i]f the owner or lease holder is not the eligible entity a commitment in writing from the building and/or land owner or lease holder authorizing the Applicant’s use of those building(s) and/or land for the purposed project”.

 
Question 25: Question re FOA-0001390: Possibilities for this application include implementing technology that is currently at TRL 8. Given that TRL 8 represents a completed system “qualified through test and demonstration” and that “this TRL represents the end of true system development”, would there be flexibility for accepting applications for technology at this level, especially if by the time of installation the technology is projected to have reached TRL 9?
Answer 25:

Yes, DOE would consider technology designated as TRL 8 at the time the application is submitted, as long as the technology is warrantied and at TRL 9 (commercially-proven) prior to installation. It is strongly recommended, though, that you describe in depth the current state of the technology and how the technology will meet the Funding Opportunity Requirements prior to installation.

 
Question 26: 1. The FOA for DE-FOA-0001390, Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands specifies PDF format submittals for the Design and Engineering File, Economics File, Subcontract Plan, and Statements of Commitment and Cost Sharing files. However the EERE Exchange only allows for submittal of these files in .doc format. Will you be updating the EERE Exchange to allow for submittal of these documents in .pdf format? Note that it would be difficult to provide engineering and design info, and copies of signed statements of commitment/cost-sharing, in .doc format. 2. Within the EERE Exchange, there is currently no way to remove a file after it has been uploaded, so that it can be replaced with another file if necessary (ex: updating attachments with more recent info, fixing a file that has been uploaded erroneously, etc.). Do you plan to revise this feature?
Answer 26:
  1. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.  We will correct EERE Exchange such that EERE Exchange allows pdf documents.

 

  1. We will explore that capability.  In the interim, please contact us at tribal@ee.doe.gov if you need assistance removing or replacing files.
 
Question 27: The FOA for DE-FOA-0001390, Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands specifies Site and Resource Maps and Graphic Files be submitted in PDF format. The EERE Exchange only allows for submittal of Site and Resources Maps in .doc format. Will you be updating the EERE Exchange to allow for submittal of Maps in .pdf format? 6. SITE AND RESOURCE MAPS AND GRAPHICS FILE (OPTIONAL) Supply any graphics to supplement the Technical Volume including maps, photographs, or other visuals of the project location or building(s) affected by the proposed project. Include evidence of the availability and sustainability of the renewable energy resource or natural gas supply (if applicable) including resource maps and quantitative resource data. Evidence may be in the form of a previously completed resource or feasibility study. Any supplemental information or supporting studies should be included here. Save this information in a single PDF file titled “ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_MapsResources”.
Answer 27:

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.  We will correct EERE Exchange such that EERE Exchange allows pdf documents.

 
Question 28: For the project we are thinking of focusing on elder homes located on the reservation. On page 10 of the FOA, under Topic 2, the 2nd sentence reads community-scale means "substantial number of total building or substantial % of the total community's energy load." How do you define 'substantial' (i.e., 25%, 50%)?
Answer 28:

Because of the wide variation in the numbers of buildings and the amounts of energy load within tribal communities, as well as related differences between communities in the contiguous United States and Alaska, DOE cannot meaningfully establish a specific percentage that constitutes  “substantial.” For purposes of this Funding Opportunity Announcement, however, “substantial” means of “ample or considerable amount”.    

 

To address this concern we have also added a requirement as part of per Modification 0001 to include under the Technical Volume an explanation and rationale for why your proposed project meets the community-scale requirement, specifically addressing the “substantial” element.

 
Question 29: Seeking clarification on the match required for the grant. The Tribe is considering using funds from the California Department of Community Services and Development (CSD)’s Low-Income Weatherization Program. The Low-Income Weatherization Program is funded by proceeds from California's Cap-and-Trade auctions and maintained in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF). Are these funds allowable as the match?
Answer 29:

Per the Funding Opportunity Announcement “[a]ll cost share must come from non‐Federal sources unless otherwise allowed by law.” However, based on your description, those funds would appear to be non-Federal funds and if non-Federal funds, allowable as cost share.

 

Note that the requirement under this FOA is “cost share which is a percentage based on the total allowable cost of the project, not a match against DOE requested funds.”

 
Question 30: I reach out today to request two points of clarification on behalf of a client--an American Indian Tribe--who is potentially interested in submitting an application to the FOA DE-FOA-0001390 “Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands 2015.” Specifically, I have questions around (1) warranty requirements and (2) cost share reductions. I would appreciate clarifications on these points as we determine if the project concept would fit under this solicitation. 1) As part of the project concept, the client is interested in deploying an innovative flow battery design--which, while commercially available (at TRL9)--may not meet the warranty requirements of the solicitation. Could you clarify what the specific warranty requirements are for technology supported by this FOA? 2) Our client is a tribe that has very little money available for this project and could not likely meet the 50% cost share requirements. How feasible or likely is obtaining a reduction in cost share? Would you consider allowing funds from USDA or state-level grants to meet this cost share? I sincerely appreciate your attention to these questions, and look forward to seeing the answers posted to the Q&A on the EERE Exchange.
Answer 30:
  1. The term “warranty” generally means a guarantee or promise which provides assurance by one party to the other party that specific facts or conditions are true or will happen. This factual guarantee may be enforced, regardless of materiality, and allows for a legal remedy, if that promise is not true or followed.

     

    Generally, for purposes of this FOA, DOE expects that a warranty will cover defects in materials and workmanship and potentially the replacement of parts and labor for the failed components (or a portion thereof) for a specified period of time.  The warranty should also describe the conditions under which the warranty will be honored. Additionally, depending on the type of clean energy system and/or energy efficiency measure, performance, function and/or degradation may be included as part of the warranty and thereby the warranty guarantees minimum standards of quality such as  availability or amount of power production, and includes the terms under which those standards are honored.  If an applicant to this FOA is concerned that the warranty applicable to its clean energy system and/or energy efficiency measure may not meet the general requirements of a warranty, the applicant should describe the warranty as part of its Application.

     

  2. DOE is unable to advise you on the likelihood of an entity receiving a cost share reduction, as the decision will be based on a number of factors including financial statements and the economic and environmental benefits documented in the request.

     

    Per Section III.B., “[a]ll cost share must come from non-Federal sources unless otherwise allowed by law.”  Therefore, unless Federal funds through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) are specifically allowed by law to be used as non-Federal funds for purposes of meeting cost share, they would not be allowable for that purpose.  Funding received from the State can be used as cost share, provided those funds did not originate from a Federal source.

 

Question 31: I am writing with a question about the eligibility of our project for the “Deployment of Clean Energy Projects on Tribal Lands” grant opportunity. The northern California Tribe is planning to build a 5.85 MW clean energy system on its trust lands to displace electrical loads. It plans to finance the construction of the system by working with a developer who will technically own the system at completion. The Tribe will operate the system under a lease-to-purchase agreement, and will save enough on energy bills to own the system outright in 7 years. Can you tell me if this kind of development would be eligible as a proposed project under the terms of the grant?
Answer 31:

Per Section III.F, DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.

 

However, under Topic Area 2, the “proposed project must be on Indian lands, must be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity, and must benefit the eligible entity (Indian Tribe or Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization) and tribal community; however, the buildings where the energy or heat is to be used do not necessarily need to be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity.” Per Appendix A, “Owned or Controlled” for purposes of this FOA, is where the eligible entity has or has been given certain rights and duties, specifically the ability to exercise authority, direction and control over the project. Note that ownership may be private, collective, or common and some of those rights and duties may be held by different parties.

 

Therefore, eligibility will depend on whether the lease-to-purchase agreement provides the Tribe the ability to exercise authority, direction or control over the project during the 7 year period and whether DOE has assurances that the Tribe will own the project at the end of the lease period.  Also, be aware that Statements of Commitment (Section IV.C.12) are required as part of the application.

 
Question 32: The FOA states that 'Although the cost share requirement applies to the project as a whole, including work performed by members of the project team other than the Recipient, the Recipient is legally responsible for paying the entire cost share'. Does the fund for the cost-sharing have to directly come from the primary recipient? How about the fund for cost-sharing was not awarded to the primary recipient, but to another member of the project team? The FOA also states that 'Project Teams may not use independent research and development (IR&D) funds to meet their cost share obligations'. What's the exact definition of IR&D funds? The fund we intend to use was from a private foundation and was not specified as IR&D. Is it allowed to use as the matching? I'd really appreciate the clarification on these. Thank you very much!
Answer 32:

The cost share funds do not need to come from the primary recipient; however, ultimately the primary recipient is responsible for meeting that cost share in the event cost share funds originally promised by a third-party do not materialize. Although the nature of your second question is not clear, we will attempt to address it as follows. If, under your second question you are asking whether funds from a non-Federal source awarded to a third-party can be used as cost share, the answer would be yes, provided those funds meet the requirements of non-Federal source and the third-party commits to use those funds as cost share and defray project costs. See Letter of Commitment and Cost Sharing File under Section IV.C.12 (page 38).

 

Per the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), independent research and development (IR&D) means “the cost of effort which is neither sponsored by a grant, nor required in the performance of a contract, and which falls within any of the following three areas: (i) Basic and applied research, (ii) Development, and (iii) Systems and other concept formulation studies.” Generally, IR&D activities are planned, performed, and funded by companies in order to maintain or improve their technical competence or to develop new or improved products. Based on the limited information provided, if the funds are from a private foundation, not specified as IR&D, and not originating from a Federal source, it appears those funds would be allowable as cost share.

 
Question 33: We are looking to make application for the DOE Clean Energy grant opportunity. In reviewing the NOFA I had just a few questions. 1) Under the Clean Energy tract what does the phrase “solely for profit” mean? Is there a threshold or percentage? 2) Under the Clean Energy tract can the Tribe sell energy back to the utility company? 3) Under the Clean Energy tract can the Tribe seek tax credits purchased by outside entities?
Answer 33:
  1. Per Section I.C of the funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “applications for commercial or utility‐scale projects intended solely for profit through the export of electricity off Indian lands for commercial sale” are not of interest. A percentage or threshold has not been established as the intent of the FOA is for the power produced under Topic Area 2 (Community-scale) be used within the community.

  2. The Tribe can sell energy back to the utility company under limited circumstances, such as a power purchase agreement (PPA) where the utility purchases the power and provides payment to offset (defray) electricity costs within the tribal community on Indian lands.  This is not considered the same as export of electricity for gain or revenue.

  3. As long as the proposed project meets the other requirements in the FOA, such as under Topic Area 2 which requires the eligible entity to own or control the project, third-party contributions to the project for their use in defraying their tax liabilities may be used.

     

 
Question 34: I am hoping for more in-depth guidance, if possible, for determining what constitutes a comparable baseline for determining savings: Would calculating the energy usage for an existing building qualify as a method to calculate baseline energy usage for a project that will replace that building, even if the square footage between new and old buildings differ?
Answer 34:

 The electricity and/or fuel use would depend on many factors, including the type of construction, types of heating and air conditioning units, lighting, square footage, occupancy, and others. For example, whether the energy use in an existing building (regardless of square footage) would be comparable to the replacement building for the purpose of establishing a baseline, would be dependent on the assumptions used and whether the existing building is comparable.

 

Another method might be to calculate energy use in a building similar to the one being constructed, less any efficiency measures, or the incremental differences due to those features; and compare that energy information with the more efficient building that is being proposed for actual construction.

 
Question 35: Can you please clarify what types of projects are eligible under this NOFA? The language below suggests that constructing a zero energy modular home for tribal lands would be eligible under this program. Would the PV system on such a home be eligible?
Answer 35:

Section I.B of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) describes the Topic Areas and types of projects being sought. Although per Section III.F, DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential Applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted, renewable energy systems such as photovoltaic (solar electric) are eligible under Topic Area 1.a. on a facility-scale. Please see the specific requirements for Topic Area 1.a, clean energy systems, on page 5-7 of Amendment 0001 of the FOA.

 

Be aware, however, the decision of whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the Applicant.

 
Question 36: We are planning to build new tribally-owned health clinics in two rural Alaska Native communities that achieve insulation values of no less than R-70 for walls, R-50 for floors, and R-100 for roofs and use PVC Triple-pane, argon filled windows with Low E and a protective Lexan Safety Glazing. Would costs related to these energy efficiency measures be eligible under the “Deep Energy Retrofit” Energy Efficiency Measures (Topic Area 1.b.)? Thank you. I appreciate your help!
Answer 36:

For Topic Area 1.b., “Deep Energy Retrofit” Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs), “[b]uilding efficiencies may include, but are not limited to, building envelope improvements (improvements to walls, roofs, foundation slab, ceiling, windows, doors, insulation), the installation of energy efficient equipment, high-efficiency lighting, efficient appliances, air sealing, moisture management, controlled ventilation, high R-value (high thermal resistance) insulation, high efficiency windows, efficient heating systems (furnaces, boilers, passive solar), efficient cooling systems (air conditioners, evaporative coolers), ground source heat pumps, high efficiency office equipment, energy saving building electrical equipment, and efficient mechanical systems and heat recovery ventilation units.” See page 8 of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).

 

Therefore, high R-value insulation and high efficiency windows are considered building efficiencies for this FOA and as long as the project is proposing multiple EEMs those building efficiency measures would be eligible. 

 

Be aware, however, that “[o]nly the incremental costs associated with the installation of clean energy system(s) or energy efficiency measures (retrofits) will be considered allocable to the proposed DOE funded project and not the cost of constructing the building(s), or structures, unless those structures are integral to the clean energy system(s).” As a result, only the incremental costs of the high efficiency measures are eligible, meaning the incremental costs above that which would have been needed to purchase and install the non-efficient building elements (e.g., normally R-value insulation and non-efficient windows).

 
Question 37: My question is can the tribe joint-venture with an electric cooperative who provides most of the cash match, or a third-party developer who gets a PPA from the electric cooperative that serves an area larger than the reservation, provided the power plant is built on the reservation where most the power will be consumed?
Answer 37:

Per the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), applications specifically not of interest include “[a]pplications for commercial or utility-scale projects intended solely for profit through the export of electricity off Indian lands for commercial sale. As such, the power produced from a community-scale clean energy system would need to be sized to generally meet the load of the community, not over-sized such that a portion of the power is continuously “sold” off the Reservation.

 

In addition to the minimum system size requirement (50 kW rated capacity), community-scale systems proposed under Topic Area 2 of this FOA, must:

  1. Be on Indian Lands,

  2. Be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity, and

  3. Benefit the eligible entity (Indian Tribe or Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization) and tribal community.  

     

    Please see the response to question #33 for additional information on Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) and third-party contributions.  

 

 
Question 38: On Page 29 of the FOA under “Project Description and Outcomes” it states“… the potential to meet specific DOE energy saving targets”. Doing a quick search of the DOE website I was unable to find these targets. Can you provide a link to the DOE targets?
Answer 38:

The energy savings targets referenced on page 29, pertain to the energy savings requirements as specified for Topic Area 1, specifically a 15% displacement of source energy under Topic Area 1.a. and at least a 20% reduction in the total of all energy and fuel used under Topic Area 1.b.

 
Question 39: Is there a limit on how old the energy audit or industrial energy assessment can be? Does the assessment requirement only apply to Deep Energy Retrofit for Topic Area 1.b.?
Answer 39:

Yes, per Section IV.C.9 and the table on pages 24-25 of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), energy audits for deep energy retrofits are only required for Topic Area 1.B. The FOA does not specify a vintage for the energy audit(s); however, the report(s) must accurately reflect the building(s) and the building(s) baseline energy use, and must provide credible evidence of the savings to be expected as a result of the proposed energy measures. The adequacy of the audit will be evaluated as part of DOE’s review (see Criterion 2, sub-bullet 2).

 
Question 40: Our Alaska Regional Corporation is submitting a grant under the FOA Number: DE-FOA-0001390, Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands – 2015. Does the Corporation have to submit an authorizing resolution or will a letter of commitment suffice?
Answer 40:

Per Section IV.C.12 (page 38 of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “a Statement of Commitment by the Applicant and all other project participants (excluding vendors) is required as part of the application. For Indian Tribes, that Statement of Commitment must be in the form of a Tribal Council Resolution. For Tribal Energy Resource Development Organizations, Tribal Organizations or Inter‐Tribal Organizations as defined in this FOA, or any other project participants, the Statement of Commitment may be in the form of a declaration, resolution or letter by an authorized representative able to commit the entity.”

 

Be aware, however, that the Application will be evaluated on the demonstrated level of commitment as evidenced by those commitments to the project. Therefore, given the option, the Applicant will need to determine whether a resolution or a letter of commitment demonstrates that commitment best.

 
Question 41: Our Tribe is working on submitting a grant application for the program “Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands-2015,” and we have 2 questions on the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) and are hoping you are able to provide answers to the following: 1. On the bottom of page 47 under Criterion 2: Project Description and Outcomes, the following verbiage is used: “o Adequacy of the”. Question: Adequacy of what? This sentence ended without completion?? 2. On the top of page 29 under “Applicant Description” the following verbiage is used: Applicant’s long-term energy goals/vision, location, organization structure and demographics. Question: What population do you need demographic information on? The Tribe? The users of the building(s) which will be retrofitted/updated? Or other? (Please explain)
Answer 41:
  1. Under the second bullet under Criterion 2, Project Description and Outcomes, the criterion is the “[a]dequacy of the available clean energy resource(s); and/or the adequacy of the energy audit(s) or assessment(s).

  2. Under the Applicant Description under the Application Executive Summary, the demographics would reflect those of the community affected.

Please ensure you are reviewing the latest Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) which is Modification 0001, issued September 22, 2015.

 
Question 42: In reading through the announcement, I noted that pre-award costs may or may not be approved. We have stamped construction drawings and specifications for our proposed biomass district heating project in our Alaskan village, funded in part by DOE and the state of Alaska Energy Authority. Would those costs be considered eligible to meet the match requirements? We don’t anticipate additional costs prior to submission.
Answer 42:

As indicated in the response to Question #18 under the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the EERE Exchange website, “[e]xcept for pre-award costs with prior DOE approval, only cost share contributions made during the period of the project, if awarded, can be considered.  Additionally, federal funds, unless otherwise allowed by law, are not allowable cost share. See Section II.B (Cost Sharing) for instances where Federal funds are permissible for use as cost share.”

 

Therefore, prior DOE funding cannot be used as cost share, nor any costs incurred prior to selection towards negotiation of award. Costs incurred after selection for negotiation towards awards, but prior to the actual award, may be considered, but only with DOE Contracting Officer approval.

 
Question 43: The Tribe is considering an application for the Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands grant for a new building we plan to construct in 2016. We plan to install solar panels, and other energy efficiency measures in this building, so I believe this project is eligible. My question is what is the "proposed project period" for this grant? I read that we have to construct the new building within the proposed project period but I haven't been able to find the actual project period. Thank you for your assistance.
Answer 43:

The project period is the period of performance of the grant, meaning during the grant period.  Per the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), the expected date for DOE selection notifications is March 2016 and the expected timeframe for award negotiations 90 days after receipt of all requested supplemental information.

 

Therefore, assuming requested supplemental information is received by the end of April, and award negotiations take 90 days, the start date is expected by the middle of 2016. Additionally, per the Executive Summary and Section II.A.2 of the FOA, the period of performance or project period is “1 to 2 years, but no longer than 3 years (including the energy savings verification period for Topic Area 1).  Therefore, in the example above, the proposed project period would be from July 2016 to the end of June 2017, 2018, or 2019 depending on the length of project proposed. Please note that the start and end date of the grant (otherwise known as the project period or period of performance) are negotiated prior to award.

 

Please note that energy efficiency measures (EEMs) are only eligible under Topic Area 1.b.  However, clean energy systems (renewable energy systems or combined heat and power systems) may be proposed along with the EEMs under Topic Area 1.b., and such clean energy systems must then meet the requirements specified under Section I.B of the FOA. Also, be aware that only the incremental cost of the proposed energy efficiency measures and renewable energy system will be considered, not the cost of the building.  Specifically, see Question #36 under the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on EERE Exchange at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/FAQ.aspx?FoaId=4a7967f3-f608-497f-a02d-95c215342d15.

 
Question 44: Can you please explain what is meant in the statements found in the Other Selection Factors, page 49 of the Mod 1 FOA, in particular the following Program Policy Factors? • The degree to which the proposed project, including proposed cost shares, optimizes the use of available DOE funding to achieve programmatic objectives; and • Geographic or technology diversity; Are these policies listed in a priority order, and to how will geographic equity be applied in the selection of applications?
Answer 44:

The Program Policy Factors listed on page 49 of Modification 0001 to the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) are in no particular order. The Selection Official may at his/her discretion apply these factors in making selection decisions, or may decide to accept the ratings of the Merit Review Committee.  The first factor above involves maximizing the amount of new clean energy generation or maximizing the reduction in fossil fuel used relative to the proposed DOE funding investment. 

 

The second bullet above involves both technology and/or geographic dispersion.  For example, if eight applications are considered on technical merit, funding is only available to fund five of those applications and seven of those applications are in a particular state, whereas the eighth application is in a different state, the Selection Official may choose to fund four applications in the one state and then choose to expand the geographic diversity by selecting the eighth application because it is in a different state. For technology diversity, the Selection Official may, for example, opt to select applications proposing a mix of different technologies (e.g., wind, biomass, natural gas fuel combined heat and power) rather than selecting only applications proposing solar electric system installations.

 
Question 45: I work with a company in Fairbanks, Alaska, and we are working on a Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands application. We are writing the application for an organization that is constructing multiple new health clinics in several of the communities it serves. Each clinic construction project is using the same energy efficient construction methods and materials, and will be using the same clinic design. Can we submit one application to include two of these construction projects, as the requests for each will be identical in materials, construction costs and budgets, or do we need to submit two separate applications?
Answer 45:

Per the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “[e]ach application must be limited to a single unique and distinct project. Unrelated projects should not be consolidated in a single application.” Additionally, per the FOA’s Executive Summary, “Applicants may submit more than one application to this FOA or under a Topic Area, provided that each application is for a unique and distinct project. One application must be provided for each specific project. Submittals under different Topic Areas cannot be combined under one application, except as noted under Topic Area 1.b.”

 

Even thoughDOE will not make eligibility decisions prior to the date on which applications to this FOA are submitted and the decision of whether to submit an application lies solely with the Applicant, the installations, as described, could be considered as two distinct projects effecting two different communities; however, because of the similarities, they may also be considered related projects and included under one application. Be aware, however, DOE will not advise you on your proposal strategy or the implications of submitting one or two separate applications.

 
Question 46: The two questions I have that I did not see addressed anywhere are for Topic Area 1.B: 1) Is there a specific modeling software we are required to utilize? AkWarm is our preference. 2) Do the auditor and cost estimator have to have any particular certifications?
Answer 46:  
  1. There is no specific modeling software required for the energy audits; however, the report(s) must accurately reflect the building(s) and the building(s) baseline energy use, and must provide credible evidence of the savings to be expected as a result of the proposed energy measures.

  2. There are no particular certifications required for the auditor and cost estimator.

However, the adequacy of the energy audit will be evaluated as part of DOE’s review (see Criterion 2, sub-bullet 2) and the percentage of energy saved or displaced will be independently verified.

Question 47: Our Tribe is working on submitting a grant application for the program “Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands - 2015,” and we have 2 questions and are hoping you are able to provide answers to the following: 1) Do all individual parts need to be manufactured in the United States (in addition to the system as a whole)? 2) Are clean systems with an uninterruptable power supply considered more unique than a clean system with a traditional turbine?
Answer 47:
  1. To the greatest extent practicable, all equipment and products purchased with funds made available under this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) should be American‐made. This requirement does not apply to used or leased equipment.

  2. We are not clear on the impetus for your question; however, uniqueness is not a qualifying or review factor under this FOA.  In regards to the sentence, “[a]pplicants may submit more than one application to this FOA or under a Topic Area, provided that each application is for a unique and distinct project”, unique is not intended to describe the innovation of the system, but rather that each application represent a distinctive, separate and different project.

 
Question 48: 1) Cost share waiver – Is this requested prior to submission or with submission? If prior to submission what is the process and how long does receipt of approval take? If with submission how does the applicant address the possibility of rejection of the request? 2) The design phase of our project is 95% complete, however we have received new information concerning the location placement of our boilers to be installed under the construction phase. Is additional design funding allowable under a request for construction funding to address this change?
Answer 48:  
  1. Cost share waiver – A cost share reduction request (see Section III.B.7.) would be submitted as an attachment to the application. See the table on page 24 of Modification 0001 (Section IV.C, Content and Form pf the Application) for components of an application and specifically, Section IV.C.19 (Cost share Reduction Request) and Section IV.C.20 (Financial Statements) for more on those attachments. Note that Financial Statements are a required attachment to the application if a cost share reduction is requested. The application, specifically the Application for Financial Assistance (SF-424), Budget Justifications (EERE 335), and Statement of Commitment and Cost Sharing) should reflect the requested cost share reduction. As indicated in Section III.B.7., “[i]f DOE does not grant the request for reduced cost share, the Applicant will be required to meet the requisite 50% cost share.” Therefore, if the application is selected for negotiation towards award and the cost share reduction request is not approved, as part of the negotiation process, the applicant will have the opportunity to either: (1) meet the 50%, requiring impacted components of the application to be revised; or (2) decline the award.

  2. It is intended that sufficient design has been completed in sufficient detail to allow reasonably accurate estimates of construction and operation costs, as well as schedule.  However, it is understood that the details of the design may change up until installation or even to a lesser degree during construction. Therefore, it is expected that the overwhelming majority of the design process has been completed and that the cost associated with finalizing those designs, under this circumstance, would be allowable, however they are expected to be de minimus to the overall project budget.

     
 

 

Question 49: It appears that “community scale” is defined in the FOA; however, “community” is not. Can you please provide a definition of “community” for purposes of this FOA? For instance, is it narrowly defined as an entire municipal entity or tribal reservation, or can it be more broadly construed, as in for example a multi-family housing community, such as might be in place for a group of people experiencing disabilities, or seniors?
Answer 49:

For purposes of this FOA, “community‐scale” means a project serving a substantial number of the total buildings within a community and/or providing a substantial percentage of the total community energy load. For purposes of this FOA, “substantial” means of “ample or considerable amount”. “Facility‐scale” for purposes of this announcement mean a single or multiple “Tribally‐owned or controlled building(s)” located on Indian lands.

 

“Community” for purposes of this FOA generally means a group of people living in the same locality and under the same government such as a municipal entity, Alaska Native village, or tribal reservation.

 

It appears from the limited description provided that a multi-family housing community might fall under Topic Area 1 (Tribal Building Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Retrofits) for facility-scale applications to a single or multiple buildings; however, without a more detailed description it is not clear.

 
Question 50: The Tribe is preparing an application for the subject FOA. We have secured energy usage and costs from our local utility for 6 homes which we propose to retrofit with solar PV panels. We have 2 questions in this regard: 1) The documents that we have secured are a listing (by meter number) of the electricity usage and costs for the 6 homes. This information is the same information that appears on the electric bills. The difference is that it is listed on 1 page per home rather than 12 copies of bills per home. Does this suffice to meet the documentation requirements or do we need to upload the bills (72 pages in all). 2) Two of the homes had a few months with 0 energy usage. Will the fact that there was no energy usage be a disqualifying factor for those homes or does it just add to the challenge of attempting to decrease energy consumption?
Answer 50:
  1. Per the Funding opportunity Announcement (FOA), annual consumption must be based on actual annual consumption as evidence by utility bills such as electric utility bills, fuel purchase invoices, or other comparable documentation for the energy source(s) to be displaced, that annual energy consumption data must be provided as an attachment under the Energy Use Data File. If the use and cost data by meter contains the same information as the actual utility bills, that documentation may be summited in lieu of the individual monthly bills. If, however, after review that information is insufficient, the more detailed information may be requested.

  2. The percentage of electricity displaced will be based on average annual consumption and since there was no energy use for a few months for two of the homes, these homes will not be disqualified, however, that fact will add to your challenge of meeting the required percentage to be displaced.

 
Question 51: In reading through the announcement, specifically the section Workplan Format (Appendix D) on Milestones and Milestone Verification (Pages 98 – 110), it appears that DOE and/or NREL Personnel must review each and every deliverable and milestone achieved. Does this review mean that subsequent activities are on hold until such time the DOE/NREL Personnel reviews and approves the preceding activity before the applicant may move forward with the project? The example may be project specific, our project is not as complex as the example. If so, I assume there is a time constraint/limit in which DOE and/or NREL Personnel must reply in order to maintain the success of the project schedule. How much time should an applicant budget for this review?
Answer 51:

The sample milestone summary tables provided as attachments are specifically for Cooperative Agreements, not grants.  Also, the example cited in your question is specific to a research and development project and the other two examples for large complex projects. Each Statement of Project Objectives (project scope) and milestone table should be specific to the project being proposed. Also, note that if that project is selected for negotiation towards award, the Statement of Project Objectives will be negotiated and agreed upon by both the applicant and DOE.

 

Generally, under a grant, DOE’s review and approval is reserved for any post-award National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) determinations, Go/No-Go decisions, grant modifications, or between budget periods if the project is incrementally funded. The time needed for DOE’s review and approval cannot be projected as it will depend on the particular situation and what is being reviewed and approved.

 

For purposes of responding to the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), assume individual milestones do not require DOE review and approval and only include DOE review and approval in those situations where it is warranted, such as the examples above.

 
Question 52: Question regarding the wording of the requirements. On page 33 - the Business and Technical Contacts...are to be "representatives of the Indian Tribe..." That doesn't mean that they have to be members of the Indian Tribe, correct? Neither I, the developer, nor the owner of the installation operation, are native, but are working in concert and on behalf of an authorized Tribal Organization. As such I believe I would be the "Business Contact" and he the "Technical Contact" as we have been explicitly authorized in the Statement of Commitment to be representing the Tribe for this process.
Answer 52:

Per page 28 of Modification 0001 of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), “[t]he Applicant’s “Business Contact” and “Technical Contact” must be representatives of the Indian Tribe, Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization or Tribal Consortium, or authorized Tribal or Inter‐tribal Organization, if applicable. [Emphasis added]

  • The Applicant’s “Business Contact” must be a representative of the Applicant authorized to act on behalf of the Applicant in the daily administration of the grant and to negotiate the agreement (not necessarily the signatory). Note that all DOE official written correspondence related to this announcement, or agreement, if one is awarded, would be addressed to the “Business Contact”.
  • The Applicant’s “Technical Contact” is one authorized to act as project manager on behalf of the Applicant and would be the prime point of contact for DOE’s Project Officer during the project performance, if an agreement is awarded.


As the agreement (if one is awarded) will be between the eligible entity and the DOE, the Business Contact who is authorized to act on behalf of the eligible Applicant must be a representative of the eligible Applicant.  It is highly recommended that the Technical Contact (project manager) also be a representative of the eligible Applicant; however, if that authority is deferred to a representative of another participating entity, written delegation from the eligible Applicant will be required.

 
Question 53: On page 27 - regarding the Cover Sheet. In all materials the FOA is FOA-0001390 but it suggests here that the FOA needs to be listed as 0001021. Which is it?
Answer 53:

Thank you for bringing this error to our attention. The cover page of the Technical Volume should include the number for this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), DE-FOA-0001390.

 
Question 54: Our Tribe is working on submitting a grant application for the program “Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands - 2015,” we are hoping you are able to provide an answer to the following question: What level of information are you looking for us to provide regarding, “Adequacy of the available clean energy resource(s) (Criterion 2, pg. 48 of FOA)”?
Answer 54:

The adequacy of the available clean energy resource(s) under Criterion 2 on page 48 of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is the criterion by which the reviewers will review an application.  The information to be reviewed to determine the adequacy of the available clean energy resource(s) is described in the Technical Volume content beginning at the bottom of page 30 and duplicated below.

 

“If a renewable energy or combined heat and power system(s) are being proposed (Topic Area 1.a and Topic Area 2), describe the availability and sustainability of the renewable energy resource(s) or natural gas supply. Provide evidence including site maps, resource maps, and/or quantitative resource data documenting those resources and include as an attachment under the Site and Resource Map and Graphics File. Evidence may also be in the form of a previously completed feasibility study. Include any agreements, such as for biomass feedstock supply, under the Agreements File (see the Roles, Responsibilities, Resources, Capabilities, and Commitments section of the Technical Volume). If the proposed project includes feedstock supply, provide information that demonstrates the sustainability of the forest or other resource proposed, quantify the available biomass feedstock (tons per year), and describe the land ownership and the harvesting and/or delivery plan.”

 
Question 55: I am trying to gauge if a project we are thinking of applying for is applicable to this funding opportunity. In reading the FOA it appears this is for larger scale, more community based projects, am I correct? What we are looking to do is fund a geothermal project (heating/cooling systems) at the reservation gas station and/or the housing units? Would something like this fit this funding opportunity?
Answer 55:

DOE is unable to advise you on the applicability of your proposed project as the decision of whether to submit an application lies solely with the Applicant.

 

However, I would direct you to Topic Area 1 of the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) which is to install clean energy and energy efficiency retrofit projects for tribal buildings. Specifically under Topic Area 1, DOE is soliciting applications for the deployment of “facility‐scale”: (a) Clean energy systems (renewable energy or combined heat and power systems) to displace electrical, heating and/or cooling loads; and/or (b) “Deep energy retrofit” measures to reduce the total of all energy used in a building or buildings (total of all energy sources combined including, but not limited to, electrical, propane, heating oil, diesel oil, natural gas, or any other energy source or fuel used for electrical production, heating and/or cooling).

 

“Facility‐scale” for purposes of this announcement means a single or multiple “Tribally‐owned or controlled building(s)” located on Indian lands and “Tribally‐owned or controlled building(s)” for purposes of this FOA, is one where the eligible entity has the authority to retrofit the building and where the building is either owned by the eligible entity or tribal members, or the eligible entity has a long‐term lease (at least 20 years). Buildings may include, but are not limited to, tribal member homes, schools, community buildings, clinics, tribal government buildings, utility facilities (such as water/waste water systems), tribal casinos, or tribal businesses.

 

Please note that for purposes of this FOA, ground source heat pumps are considered energy efficiency measures and only eligible under Topic Area 1.b.

 
Question 56: Question regarding the wording of the requirements. On page 33 - the Business and Technical Contacts...are to be "representatives of the Indian Tribe..." The question of being a "representative" of the Tribe - Business or Technical - do they have to be "enrolled members of the Tribe/applicant" or is a letter authorizing non-tribal individuals to act as representatives for the applicant for this FOA? Bottom line - do the Business and Technical Contacts have to be enrolled Tribal members?
Answer 56:

As the agreement will be between the Department of Energy and an Indian Tribe or other eligible entity, it is preferred that the point-of-contact for the grant be representatives of the Indian tribe or other eligible entity.

 

The Applicant’s “Business Contact” must be a representative of the Applicant authorized to act on behalf of the Applicant in the daily administration of the grant and to negotiate the agreement (not necessarily the signatory). Note that all DOE official written correspondence related to this announcement, or agreement, if one is awarded, would be addressed to the “Business Contact”. A representative (Business or Technical Contact) of the Applicant in this case, does not necessarily have to be an enrolled member of the Indian Tribe, but must be employed by the Indian Tribe and have the authority to act on behalf of the Indian Tribe. For example, some Indian Tribes have designated their Chairperson, Tribal Administrator, Grants Manager, Finance Manager, or other similar authorized representative as the Business Contact for DOE grants.

 

Similarly, the Technical Contact does not necessarily need to be an enrolled member of the Indian Tribe, but typically is employed by the Indian Tribe and designated to act as the project manager on behalf of the Indian Tribe.  Although it is preferred that the Technical Contact be a representative of the Indian Tribe, the Indian Tribe may request that someone from another entity to act on their behalf. If so, a written statement designating that person as the Technical Contact for the grant and authorizing that individual to act on their behalf is required as part of the application.      

 
Question 57: We will be applying for this grant under Topic area 1b to provide an energy retrofit for an existing manufacturing facility. We have set aside funds sufficient to replace the roof on the facility which will greatly enhance the EE measures that are planned under the project. Can the replacement of the roof serve as our cost share so long as the replacement occurs during the period of performance under the grant?
Answer 57:

DOE is unable to advise you on the applicability of your proposed project as the decision of whether to submit an application lies solely with the Applicant.

 

However, I would direct you to the definition of energy efficiency measures (EEM) on page 8 of Modification 0001 to the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), which includes building envelope improvements (improvements to walls, roofs, foundation slab, ceiling, windows, doors, insulation). As such, if a particular measure is eligible, costs associated with that measure may either be requested from DOE, or proposed as cost share. Please note that all costs will be reviewed for applicability and allowability.

 
Question 58: I'm an energy efficiency grant writer working with a company that installs LED retrofit lighting throughout the Midwest. One of their most recent potential clients is a building on a Reservation. The Tribe owns 51% of the company and it is a for-profit business. After reviewing some of the application requirements, I'd like to make sure that that building would qualify for the DE-FOA-0001390 grant opportunity before we start the process.
Answer 58:


DOE is unable to advise you on the applicability or eligibility of your proposed project as the decision of whether to submit an application lies solely with the Applicant.

 

However, for Topic Area 1, I would direct you to the definition of “tribally‐owned or controlled building(s)” which for purposes of this FOA, is one where the eligible entity has the authority to retrofit the building and where the building is either owned by the eligible entity or tribal members, or the eligible entity has a long‐term lease (at least 20 years). Buildings may include, but are not limited to, tribal member homes, schools, community buildings, clinics, tribal government buildings, utility facilities (such as water/waste water systems), tribal casinos, or tribal businesses. Therefore, if the proposed project is submitted under Topic 1, the eligible Applicant would need to demonstrate that they had the authority to retrofit or install clean energy systems on/for the building, which if applicable, may require additional documentation from the other building owner(s) consenting to the retrofits or installation of clean energy systems. Per the Statement of Commitment (Section IV.C.12), “[i]f the owner or lease holder is not the eligible entity, a commitment in writing from the building and/or land owner or lease holder authorizing the Applicant’s use of those building(s) and/or land for the proposed project must be provided”.

 

Be aware that to be eligible under topic Area 1.b (“Deep Energy Retrofit” Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs)), “[o]nly projects proposing multiple EEMs will be considered; if an application proposes only a single EEM, the application will be deemed nonresponsive under and will not be reviewed or considered.

 

Note that under Topic Area 2 (Community‐Scale Clean Energy Deployment) that “[a]ll proposed projects must be on Indian lands, must be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity, and must benefit the eligible entity (Indian Tribe or Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization) and tribal community; however, the buildings where the energy or heat is to be used do not necessarily need to be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity. [Emphasis added]

 
Question 59: We are working on grant application for the funding opportunity under DE-FOA-0001390 for a deep energy retrofit project that includes an air to water heat pump to replace costly fuel oil heating for a low-income multi-family housing building in Southeastern Alaska. The community has a cool climate well suited to air-to-water heat pumps, and has affordable renewable hydroelectric power as the source of its electricity since it is within one of Alaska’s special hydroelectric communities. With energy conservation measures and conversion from fuel oil to the renewable air source heat pump, the project will drastically reduce the total energy used onsite. Since the facility is located in one of Alaska’s special hydroelectric communities, this source of power is renewable and affordable in the community, and the client is attempting to move over its buildings from the dirty and expensive fuel oil to the local renewable resource (hydro). The question is whether we are required to use the multiplier of 3.14 (site to source conversion factor) for electricity as listed in the appendix when calculating energy savings. It would seem that it should not apply here, but we would like to clarify. Since the project would move all the space and hot water heating to electricity, if the DOE listed factor is used, the project would not meet the energy reduction threshold. The Alaska Housing Finance Authority has run into this issue before, and has developed a conversion factor of 1.5 (site to source) for Alaska’s special hydroelectric communities. This project is in one of Alaska’s special hydroelectric communities. We do not think the 3.14 national factor for site to source conversation for electricity should apply for this project given the renewable source of electricity, but would like clarification before the client spends more time and effort on the application process. Are we able to use the Alaska Housing Finance Authority’s factor of 1.5? We would be happy to clarify this question as appropriate. Thank you for your consideration.
Answer 59:

The prescribed methodology and conversion factors used for this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) are based on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Energy Star Program which uses national source-site ratios.

 

The efficiency of secondary energy (e.g., electricity, steam) production depends on the types of primary fuels that are being consumed and the specific equipment that is used. These characteristics are unique to specific power plants and differ across regions of the country. For example, some states have a higher percentage of hydroelectric power, while others consume greater quantities of coal.

 

Because ENERGY STAR is a national program for protecting the environment through energy efficiency, EPA has determined that it is most equitable to employ source-site ratios at the national level. As such, there is only one source-site ratio for each of the primary and secondary fuels in Portfolio Manager, including electricity. The use of national source-site ratios ensures that no specific building will be credited (or penalized) for the relative efficiency of its utility provider.

 

For purposes of this FOA, DOE has adopted EPA’s methodology for calculating energy savings and mandated that all Applicants must use the common set of conversion factors included in Table 1 of Appendix C. Therefore, you are required to use the multiplier of 3.14 for electricity (site to source conversion factor) when calculating energy savings for this FOA.

 

However, based on your inquiry, DOE will explore other methodologies and may consider alternative conversion factors in future FOAs.

 
Question 60: Hello. I am being told by people who have worked on previous DOE grants that any tribal workers hired to do labor under the grant program must be paid according to Davis-Bacon standards. I can’t find anything in the Deployment Grant FOA that applies to that topic, and couldn’t find anything on the DOE/EERE FAQs site. Can you advise? This has a significant impact on how we structure our budget for the work to be done under the grant. Thank you for any information you can provide.
Answer 60:

You have been misinformed.  Davis-Bacon Act requirements will not apply to grants awarded under the Deployment Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).  Davis-Bacon applies to financial assistance awards only if Congress incorporated that requirement into relevant program or appropriations legislation. Neither Title V of the Energy Policy Act, under which grants under this FOA will be made, nor any relevant appropriations act, require Davis-Bacon Act compliance for this FOA.

 
Question 61: On page 27 of the FOA there is a reference to using FOA -1021 (last year’s FOA) still in the instructions for the cover page, is this a typo or should we use this number when applying?
Answer 61:

The FOA reference on Page 27 is a typo, for the application cover page please state the current FOA number, DE-FOA-0001390.

 

 
Question 62: I have a question regarding the scale of the project. We operate a Transfer Station that is very inefficient and I would like to convert to Solar Energy. I am not sure if this project is large enough to be eligible for funding. If not is there other opportunities that we may qualify for, specific to Indian tribes?
Answer 62:

Please see Section I.B – Topic Areas/Technical Areas of Interest under the Funding Opportunity Announcement, for the required minimum capacity for each Topic Area. For Topic Area 1a, there is a minimum of 10kW rated capacity, or Btu equivalent of 34,121 Btu/hr for heating and cooling. For Topic Area 2, there is a minimum of 50kW rated capacity.

 

Question 63: Would a project of approximately $82,850 in total costs be eligible for consideration? Our grant request would be for 50% of that amount, or $41,425.
Answer 63:

Under Topic Area 1, Tribal Building Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Retrofits, the minimum DOE amount that can be requested is $50,000 and for Topic Area 2, Community-Scale Clean Energy Deployment, the minimum DOE amount that can be requested is $250,000.  However, if the applicant applies and is approved under the requirements for reduced cost share  (see Section II.B.7 beginning on page 19), the proposed total project costs of $82,850 would equate to a DOE request of $50,000 or more and the application would meet the minimum requirement.  Without a cost share reduction, a request in DOE funding of $41,425 would not meet the requirement under Topic Area 1.

 

 
Question 64: The plan for our project is to utilize funds from a Workforce Investment Act (WIA)-funded organization to do job training. My question: can WIA funds be used as matching funds for this program?
Answer 64:

It is unclear from your question whether Workforce Investment Act (WIA) funds would be contributed or whether the contribution to the project would be the staff time to do job training.  If the WIA funded organization were to contribute cash or time as cost share to the project, the WIA statute itself would need to designate the eligibility of those funds to be used as cost share against Federal dollars.

If the WIA funded organization were to contribute time to the project, the time would be strictly for deployment.  Staff time for training, outreach or education is not eligible under this FOA.  

 
Question 65: The Funding Opportunity Announcement clearly states; “All proposed projects must be on Indian lands, must be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity, and must benefit the eligible entity (Indian Tribe or Tribal Energy Resource Development Organization) and tribal community; however, the buildings where the energy or heat is to be used do not necessarily need to be “owned or controlled” by the eligible entity.” Do you see any problem with having a document drawn up structuring the ownership of the project so that the Tribal Council owns the machines but leases them to the City? If I am correct this would be an MOA. Do you know any other entities in the state that have a similar arrangement? I wanted to reach out to them, to see a sample of their MOA.
Answer 65:

DOE will not advise on a pending application or make eligibility determinations in advance of receiving applications and the decision to submit lies solely with the applicant (see Section III.F). The project structure and type of documentation or evidence that the applicant owns or controls the project lies solely with the applicant. DOE is not in a position to provide referrals or sample documents relative to a competitive application process.

 
Question 66: Hello, can you tell me where I can find if DOE EERE has assigned our agency a federal entity Identifier? This is requested on the SF 424. Also, I was wondering if there is a Competition Identification Number and Title, as well. We are applying for the Deployment of Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects on Indian Lands – 2015 funding. CFDA number 81.087.
Answer 66:

For instructions on completing the Financial Assistance Application form (SF-424), please see http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/form-instructions/sf-424-instructions.html.

 

For purposes of this Funding Opportunity Announcement, please leave block 5a (Federal Entity Identifier) and 5b (Federal Award Identifier) of the SF-424 form blank. Please also leave block 13 (Competition Identification Number/Title) blank.